Tuesday, September 05, 2006

Exhibition Dates

12 Feb - 12 March
Edinburgh
Open all day every day
Forest Cafe
3 Bristo Place, Edinburgh, EH1 1EY - 01
www.theforest.org

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

Glasgow to East Timor – Worlds Apart?


Robin Taudevin
Born 14 March 1977 in Papua Guinea
Died 14 May 2006 in East Timor
Independent International photojournalist

‘Fighting for Refuge
Glasgow to East Timor - Worlds Apart?’

All photographs in this exhibition were taken in the last year of Robin’s life before he drowned while free diving off the coast of Dili, East Timor where he was working for the UN and also as an independent photographer.

This exhibition runs in two parallel story lines - Glasgow and East Timor. This exhibition attempts to highlight the global and circular nature of the experience of those displaced by conflict. Both stories are far from unique. While for geographical reasons East Timorese are unlikely to seek safe refuge in the UK, those who do come here seeking asylum have often come through similar circumstances and are often met with hostility. Global asylum claims are dropping, and have dropped substantially in the UK since a peak in 2002. However, there remains a major global migration from the developing world towards the richer, safer worlds of Europe, Australia and North America. As long as the need for refuge continues, people from other countries are going to continue to claim asylum in the UK.

East Timor




East Timor

After centuries of Portuguese rule, Fretilin, the Revolutionary Front for an Independent East Timor, declared East Timor independent in 1975 after a bloody but brief civil war. In December ‘75 Indonesia invaded and occupied East Timor for the next twenty four years; an occupation not recognised by most of the world, and marked by brutality and violence. In 1996, Carlos Belo, the Bishop of Dili, and Jose Ramos Horta, a key figure of the resistance to Indonesia, were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for raising international awareness of the East Timorese independence struggle.

In May 1999, under an agreement between Indonesia and Portugal, brokered by the UN, East Timor voted overwhelmingly for independence from Jakarta despite a violent campaign by Indonesian organised militia groups. As Indonesian forces withdrew, they burnt most of the country to the ground, forcibly displaced a third of the population and killed over a thousand people before a late UN intervention force arrived. The UN effectively governed the country for two years before full independence was proclaimed on 20th May 2002.

Former resistance leader, Xanana Gusmao, who had always sought to unite East Timorese of all parties, became President of East Timor, and Mari Alkatiri , now the head of the Fretlin party, became Prime Minister. East Timor became the world’s youngest nation. With an impoverished economy, declining interest in agriculture and massive unemployment, East Timor has struggled to meet the basic needs of its population, although much progress has been made and increasing oil revenues from the Timor Sea give further reason for optimism for the future.

The current conflict began in early 2006 when around one third of the armed forces (F-FDTL) went on strike complaining of discrimination against soldiers from ‘the west’ of the country within the army. The Government responded by sacking these 594 soldiers, against he wishes of the President - and Commander in Chief - Xanana Gusmao.

In late April between 1,000 and 2,000 demonstrators hit the streets in support of the ‘594’ Group. On the 28th a group of non ‘594’ protesters became violent, throwing stones and at least one Molotov cocktail at the Government offices triggering rioting, fighting and arson in the outskirts of Dili. During a police operation to end the situation, one policeman was killed and two were injured. Later that day further violence occurred when the remaining F-FDTL troops were ordered to track down the ex F-FDTL protestors, resulting in several more killings.

Over the following weeks, there was a further breakdown of law and order when the army attacked the police headquarters, killing nine people, before both police and army were ordered to withdraw with the arrival of the Australian peace-keeping forces. Despite this military presence, gangs of youths, some of whom claim allegiances to ‘the west’ or ‘the east’, continue to loot, burn houses and government buildings and take out personal vendettas and revenge attacks. In June, amid allegations that Fretilin had armed civilian groups for political purposes, the Prime Minister resigned, and was replaced by Jose Ramos Horta. Elections are due in 2007.

Current reports estimate that some 70,000 people have fled the capital for the safer districts. The same number again continue to take shelter at night in churches, schools and other compounds, including that of the United Nations. Some 1,500 homes in Dili have been destroyed. The major international aid agencies are working with the government to manage the crisis of internally displaced people.

The full facts of this ‘situation’ are still unknown, and unsubstantiated rumours of coups or attempted coups are circulating. It is unclear whether the blame lies with internal leadership factions, external agents or the general failure of the international community to adequately support the transition to independence.

Glasgow




Glasgow

During and since WWII thousands of people have fled to the UK. In 1999 the government set out its proposal to disperse asylum seekers away from London and the South East. Glasgow City Council was the first local authority to sign up to the dispersal policy and with little or no preparation or planning time, thousands of asylum seekers began arriving in Scotland. Glasgow is now the biggest dispersal city in the UK. There are around 10,000 refugees and asylum seekers living in Glasgow today.

Most of the people in these photographs come from countries known for conflict and political instability: Algeria, Afghanistan, Congo, Sri Lanka, Iraq, Albania, former Soviet states, Somalia. There are many others. Some fled direct persecution; others fled general unrest. Some were forcibly displaced by conflict. Others stayed until life became intolerable, and then chose to seek refuge elsewhere. They are part of a major global migration from the developing world towards the richer, safer worlds of Europe, Australia and North America.

An asylum seeker is someone who has applied for refugee status. A refugee is someone who has been granted permission to remain in the UK, and qualifies for all rights as a British national. In the UK, roughly half of all asylum seekers are granted refugee status. This is granted on the basis of which country they are from, their testimony, and whatever documentary evidence they are able to present. Those people who are not considered to have fled genuine persecution are not granted refugee status. They become failed asylum seekers.

Many of the people in these photographs are failed asylum seekers. They first claimed asylum in the UK around six years ago. While the claim was processed, they were moved to Glasgow and housed in high-rise apartments, paid for by the Home Office, provided by Glasgow City Council. For many of them, the Home Office’s Immigration and Nationality Directorate rejected their claims within one or two years. Since then they have contested their rejected claims in this country’s courts, assisted by legal aid, an appeals process that can take years.

Many asylum seekers are comparatively well treated by the UK government while their claim is being processed. In Australia until recently, all asylum seekers, including children, were placed in detention. In the UK, most asylum seekers are provided with accommodation and a restricted benefits allowance. Children attend school; adults are allowed to study part time to HND level. Families and individuals establish lives here. However, not all asylum seekers enjoy this liberty. Many experience extended periods in ‘detention’, a euphemism for the deprivation of liberty, or imprisonment.

Eventually, failed asylum seekers lose their benefits and accommodation. Those who are from countries that the government categorises as ‘safe’ are liable to deportation, and may be forcibly removed from the UK. Removal is a traumatic experience. It can occur without warning early in the morning at the hands of police and immigration officials, who arrive at a family or individuals home and take them into custody, a procedure known as a ‘dawn raid’. The early morning knock on the door by immigration officials is a prospect that failed asylum seekers live with for months and even years. Removal can also occur when an asylum seeker reports to the Home Office at Brand St, Cessnock. The family or individual is usually taken into detention, transferred to England, and then sent back to their country, but sometimes they are released from detention back into their communities or moved to another part of the country.

International humanitarian law prevents the Government from deporting failed asylum seekers to countries where their security cannot be guaranteed. Instead, the government encourages voluntary repatriation, and attempts to convince failed asylum seekers to accept assistance to return home. Many refuse. They remain in the UK in legal limbo. Although people in this category are eligible for what is known as ‘hard case’ support, not all ‘non-returnable’ asylum seekers are aware that they are eligible.